Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Cost of Afghan surge

The White House Budget Office estimates that it will cost about $1 million for each additional soldier sent to Afghanistan. So, a surge of 30,000 to 40,000 troops -- which is what Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal is recommending -- would add $30 billion to $40 billion a year to the deficit.

At the Pentagon, the comptroller disagrees, estimating the cost of deploying and maintaining one soldier in Afghanistan for a full year at $500,000. So, bottom line would be $15 billion to $20 billion.

Drones in Pakistan

Friday, November 13, 2009

Surveillance

Alfred McCoy shows that overseas counterinsurgency operations in which are developed technological means to gather information about terrorists are then brought back home to the US to conduct domestic surveillance.

Afghanistan

Patrick Cockburn argues that the Afghan Police commits rapes etc.

US pays Taliban

The US indirectly pays the Taliban through paying trucking companies in Afghanistan to move their supplies. The trucking companies have to pay the Taliban (and warlords, regional powerbrokers, etc.) to ensure safe passage wherever they go in Afghanistan.
Private security companies are also hired for security of the convoys, but the security firms don't really protect convoys of US military goods here because they simply can't; they need the Taliban's co-operation.

The Taliban/insurgents make good money out of this:
"It's a big part of their income," one of the top Afghan government security officials admits. In fact, US military officials in Kabul estimate that a minimum of 10% of the Pentagon's logistics contracts – hundreds of millions of dollars – consists of payments to insurgents.
As a military official in Kabul explained contracting in Afghanistan overall, "We understand that across the board, 10-20% goes to the insurgents. My intel [intelligence] guy would say it is closer to 10%. Generally, it is happening in logistics."

In other news, about 2000 civilians have been killed so far in 2009, more than in earlier years.
More civilians have died in attacks by Taliban insurgents than by aerial strikes and military operations by pro-government Afghan and international forces: According to UNAMA, 1,397 were killed by anti-government elements, 465 by pro-government forces and 165 by other actors.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Blackwater offered bribes, still in Iraq

Blackwater top executives offered bribes to Iraqi officials to reduce criticism of shootings in 2007 in which Blackwater killed 17 Iraqis.


And US government officials were aware of those plans of bribery: A senior State Department official said that American diplomats were not aware of any payoffs to Iraqi officials. Ms. Butenis, now the United States ambassador to Sri Lanka, declined to comment for this article. But other State Department officials confirmed that embassy officials had met with Blackwater executives to encourage them to compensate the victims of Nisour Square.

The State Department replaced Blackwater with a rival company in May, but Blackwater still does some work for the department in Iraq on a temporary basis.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

More US soldiers kill at bases

Rolling Stone reports on US soldiers killing other soldiers at Fort Carson.

The point of the article is that it's not only muslims at Fort Hood who kill people when they return from battle.