Saturday, October 31, 2009
Obama has more troops in Iraq and Afghanistan than Bush
There are currently about 124,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and 65,000 in Afghanistan. There were 142,000 in Iraq and 31,000 in Afghanistan when Bush left office.
That’s 16,000 more imperialist troops occupying foreign territory, being where they shouldn’t be, meeting with resistance, getting killed under President Obama than under Bush.
Afghan warlords
It is difficult to make accurate assessments of Afghan public opinion, but the attempts at polling that have been made consistently show that the Afghan people want the government to take action against these figures and that they view corruption within the government as a top concern. A 2006 survey by Integrity Watch Afghanistan found that nearly 60 percent of respondents considered the post-2001 period the most corrupt period in the country in the past 50 years, compared to only 9 percent who said corruption was highest during the period of Taliban rule. A 2004 Afghan Human Rights Research and Advocacy Consortium survey at the beginning of Karzai’s first term in office found that 88 percent supported reducing the power of former commanders in Afghanistan, and another Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission poll in the same year found that more than 75 percent said it was “very important” for those who had committed past crimes be brought to justice.
More recent polling by the Asia Foundation in 2009 found that those identifying warlords specifically as the main source of insecurity in their area had dropped to 7 percent, but that broader concerns about corruption and the government’s failure to deliver services remained strong. Afghan attitudes toward the international community have steadily soured as the Karzai administration has reincorporated warlords back into its government structures without establishing effective checks on their abuse of power. These warlords may offer tactical assistance against terrorist targets, but American association with these figures taints Afghan perceptions of U.S motivations in the country.
Obama expands US military presence in Colombia
Under the pact, U.S. military personnel will continue to enjoy diplomatic immunity from prosecution. Some Colombians had objected to exempting U.S. military personnel from local criminal jurisdiction.
Increased U.S. military aid to Colombia's armed forces since 2000 has been key to the recent weakening of the country's main leftist rebel group. The U.S. military has offices at armed forces headquarters and advisers attached to Colombia's main army divisions.
Although there's no evidence of any direct correlation, the boost in aid and cooperation also has coincided with a sharp increase in extrajudicial killings by Colombia's military.
Friday, October 30, 2009
US/NATO allied with warlords and militias in Afghanistan
Two anonymous United Nations sources cited in the report [by Jake Sherman et al.] estimate that 1,000 to 1,500 unregistered armed security groups have been "employed, trained, and armed by ISAF" and "Coalition Forces" for security services. As many as 120,000 armed individuals are estimated by the U.N. sources to belong to about 5,000 private militias in Afghanistan.
Karzai and Diem
Another good article about the parallels says that:
"The New York Times article [on Ahmed Karzai], based on statements of "American officials" indicates only one thing: that the White House has clearly decided to confront the CIA, and Karzai, over Afghan policy, undermining both in one quick news attack."
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Obama's new missile defense against Iran
Taliban take over Nuristan province
Karzai's brother on CIA payroll
The agency pays Mr. Karzai for a variety of services, including helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the C.I.A.’s direction in and around the southern city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai’s home.
“Hundreds of millions of dollars in drug money are flowing through the southern region, and nothing happens in southern Afghanistan without the regional leadership knowing about it,” a senior American military officer in Kabul said.
Other Western officials pointed to evidence that Ahmed Wali Karzai orchestrated the manufacture of hundreds of thousands of phony ballots for his brother’s re-election effort in August. He is also believed to have been responsible for setting up dozens of so-called ghost polling stations — existing only on paper — that were used to manufacture tens of thousands of phony ballots.
A former C.I.A. officer with experience in Afghanistan said the agency relied heavily on Ahmed Wali Karzai, and often based covert operatives at compounds he owned. Any connections Mr. Karzai might have had to the drug trade mattered little to C.I.A. officers focused on counterterrorism missions, the officer said.
“Virtually every significant Afghan figure has had brushes with the drug trade,” he said. “If you are looking for Mother Teresa, she doesn’t live in Afghanistan.”
Some American counternarcotics officials have said they believe that Mr. Karzai has expanded his influence over the drug trade, thanks in part to American efforts to single out other drug lords.
In debriefing notes from Drug Enforcement Administration interviews in 2006 of Afghan informants obtained by The New York Times, one key informant said that Ahmed Wali Karzai had benefited from the American operation that lured Hajji Bashir Noorzai, a major Afghan drug lord during the time that the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, to New York in 2005. Mr. Noorzai was convicted on drug and conspiracy charges in New York in 2008, and was sentenced to life in prison this year.
Habibullah Jan, a local military commander and later a member of Parliament from Kandahar, told the D.E.A. in 2006 that Mr. Karzai had teamed with Haji Juma Khan to take over a portion of the Noorzai drug business after Mr. Noorzai’s arrest.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Monday, October 26, 2009
Afghan elections
Saturday, October 24, 2009
US target list of drug traffickers in Afghanistan
As the WP reports, for years, the NATO-led military coalition in Afghanistan ignored the opium trade, saying their mission was to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda, not drug dealers. Afghanistan's poppy fields supply about 90 percent of the world's opium.
At a meeting in Budapest last October, however, NATO defense ministers reversed their strategy and authorized their forces to confiscate narcotics and target drug labs as well as kingpins who provide monetary or other support to the Taliban.
It's important here to note that the drug traffickers that NATO are now authorized to kill, even in the face of Afghan opposition, are only those with "proven links" to the Taliban. So it doesn't mean that NATO or the US cares about eradicating drugs: they only care about fighting the Taliban.
Afghanistan
"I do believe, yes, that additional international troops are required," Eide said. "And I emphasize in particular the need that we have for such troops in order to partner better and mentor the Afghan national security forces as they grow."
The British military also agrees that more troops are needed.
Iran nuclear
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Drones Kill Civilians in Pakistan
Jundallah
But despite its claims, Jundallah is a sectarian, not liberation, movement. It is made of Sunni extremists who hate the Shi’ites, and its goal is to foment conflict between the two sects.
There is a movement in Pakistani Balochistan against the discrimination that the Baloch people suffer at the hands of the central government. The Baloch minority (totaling about 1 million) in Iran has also been discriminated against, although the Iranian government has been trying to improve the economy there. But Jundallah is not part of either struggle. Jundallah is simply a Sunni Salafi group of the Taliban or al-Qaeda variety, believed by many to have links to both groups and to be involved in drug trafficking as well.
He makes an important point that such probably US-backed attacks act also as an inhibitor on the proposed Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline, which the US opposes:
But Iran and Pakistan have signed an agreement to construct a pipeline from southern Iran to Pakistan for transporting Iran’s natural gas to Pakistan. Initially, the pipeline was supposed to continue to India, but under pressure by the Bush administration, India withdrew from the project.
If constructed, the Iran-Pakistan pipeline, which has been dubbed "the peace pipeline," will be in direct competition with the pipeline through Afghanistan, if and when that pipeline is constructed. Instability in Iran’s Baluchestan will scare away potential investors in the Iran-Pakistan pipeline, and may prevent its construction altogether. These facts play an important role in Jundallah’s attack on Iran, but the mainstream media has ignored them.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Colombia land grabs
Locals have even less love for palm oil companies. They swept in in the 1990s on the heels of rightwing paramilitaries who killed and evicted peasants from their fields of corn and yucca, claiming they were guerrilla sympathisers.
Thousands of farmers, displaced and desperate, sold their land to companies that planted thousands of hectares of palm, which is used to make margarine, crisps, chocolate, soap, cosmetics and biofuel.
Armed groups have seized around 5.5m hectares during the past two decades, with indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities bearing the brunt, the relief agency Cafod said. "Current policies promoting the exploitation of natural resources, most recently biofuels, increase the risk that land belonging to displaced communities will end up, by dubious or illegal means, in the hands of businesses."
State loans have funded the palm expansion, with some firms returning the favour by funding President Alvaro Uribe's election campaigns. He promotes the plantations as a way to bring the countryside into the 21st century.The army, officially neutral, appears to side with plantation owners. The Guardian accompanied one peasant, Jorge Lopez, 64, as he tried to reclaim his land after a 12-year absence. Soldiers first tried to block him, then summoned the palm company foreman.
The government, embarrassed by international scrutiny and criminal investigations into 23 palm companies, recently ordered some firms to return land to peasants.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Taliban finances
Top American intelligence officials and diplomats say there is no evidence so far that the governments of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or other Persian Gulf states are providing direct aid to the Afghan insurgency. But American intelligence officials say they suspect that Pakistani intelligence operatives continue to give some financial aid to the Afghan Taliban, a practice the Pakistani government denies.
Drugs is a second source of income.
A third major source of financing for the Taliban is criminal activity, including kidnappings and protection payments from legitimate businesses seeking to operate in Taliban-controlled territory, American authorities say.
The United States has created two new entities aimed at disrupting the trafficking networks and illicit financing. One group, the Afghan Threat Finance Cell, is located at Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul. The second group, the Illicit Finance Task Force based in Washington, also aims to identify and disrupt the financial networks supporting terrorists and narcotics traffickers in the region.See also this article in the WP.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Iran oil trading in non-dollar currencies
Peter Galbraith and the Kurds' oil
Galbraith--the son of John Kenneth Galbraith--has worked as an adviser for the Kurds in Iraq and has argued strongly for a decentralization of the country, including strong Kurdish control over the oil resources in their region.
But in June 2004, Galbraith established a small, U.S.-registered company, Porcupine, that held a five percent stake in a newly exploited oilfield in Iraqi Kurdistan, a Norwegian daily revealed last Saturday.
So the issue is that he had a conflict of interest.
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Agent Orange
Agent Orange was sprayed over 1.4 million hectares—12% of the total land area of Vietnam and almost 25% of the southern half of the country.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Karzai's cabinet
House votes for Iran sanctions
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Iran
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Monday, October 12, 2009
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Millions will starve as rich countries cut aid
Tens of millions of the world's poor will have their food rations cut or cancelled in the next few weeks because rich countries have slashed aid funding.
The result, says Josette Sheeran, head of the UN's World Food Programme (WFP), could be the "loss of a generation" of children to malnutrition, food riots and political destabilisation. "We are facing a silent tsunami," said Sheeran in an exclusive interview with the Observer. "A humanitarian disaster is unrolling." The WFP feeds nearly 100 million people a year.
The US, by far the world's biggest contributor to food aid, has so far pledged $800m less than in 2008; Saudi Arabia has paid only $10m in 2009 compared with $500m in 2008; and the EU has given $130m less. Britain's promise of $69m (£43.5m) this year is nearly $100m (£63m) less than 2008, and, if nothing more is given, will be its lowest contribution since 2001.
Iran medical uranium
Friday, October 9, 2009
Greenwald on Iran
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Zunes on Goldstone report
The report confirmed other ones such as this one by B'Tselem.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Israel nuclear weapons
All 10 nonpermanent members voted for the resolution, along with permanent members Russia, China and the United Kingdom. France and the United States abstained. By U.N. rules, that means the resolution passes.
The resolution calls for a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East. It also demands that Israel sign the 1970 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and submit its nuclear facilities to international inspection. Two similar, albeit nonbinding, resolutions were approved last September by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Israeli blackmail
Rearm the warlords!
This is certainly the most ridiculous idea of the day.
Iran: nuclear latency option
Monday, October 5, 2009
Gilad Shalit and Goldstone
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Opium in Helmand
Eradication programs are riddled with corruption.
Germany gives Israel nuclear submarines
It just gave Israel another 2 submarines that are fitted to carry nuclear missiles.
With the latest delivery, Israel now holds five state-of-the-art U212s, designed for a crew of 35 and capable of launching cruise missiles that carry nuclear warheads to a distance of 2,810 miles.
Iran nuclear program
Gareth Porter outlines a legal case in favor of Iran:
Although it has remained unreported in the news media, however, Iran has a legal case that it has remained in compliance with its Safeguards Agreement.
In March 2009, the director of the IAEA Office of Legal Affairs, Johan Rautenbach, called Iran’s reversion to implementation of the earlier version of the Code 3.1 "inconsistent with its obligations under the Subsidiary Arrangements."
But he went on to say that it was "difficult to conclude that providing information in accordance with the earlier formulation in itself constitutes non-compliance with, or a breach of, the Safeguards Agreement as such."
The Safeguards Agreement itself clearly forbids unilateral "modification" of a Subsidiary Arrangement, but it says nothing about withdrawal from such an agreement, which is what Iran is asserting it did in March 2007.
The distinction between "modification" and "withdrawal" from provisions of an international agreement is well established in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
Unilateral withdrawal is permitted under that Convention, provided that the provision in question is separable from the remainder of the agreement, is not the essential basis of consent by the other party and continued performance of the remainder of the agreement would not be "unjust."
The head of the IAEA Legal Department appears to have accepted that those three conditions applied to the case of Iran’s "Modified Code 3.1" agreement.Friday, October 2, 2009
China calls for US withdrawal from Afghanistan
China also suggests that the international community work to bring a peace transition and send an international peacekeeping force to Afghanistan.
This is the first time that a Chinese commentary has openly called for the withdrawal of US and NATO troops from Afghanistan in immediate terms as a pre-requisite of peace.
Iran agrees to send some uranium to Russia and France for enrichment
The uranium would then be returned, enriched, to Iran, which could use it for medical applications.
Tehran also agreed to open its new facility to inspectors within 2 weeks.
Iran’s uranium is enriched to about 3.5 to 5 percent, the officials said; the Tehran reactor for making medical isotopes, last powered by Argentine-made fuel in 1993, needs uranium enriched to 19.75 percent, still far below weapons grade. And that uranium must then be fabricated into metal rods for the reactor.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon is justifying a West Coast missile defense against Iranian missiles--which in no way can reach the US.
Pentagon policy chief Michele Flournoy, appearing before the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, said the 30 ground-based interceptor missiles to be deployed in Alaska and California by the end of 2010 will "provide the United States with full protection of the homeland against an Iranian ICBM threat."
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Opium in Afghanistan
A Brookings report on Obama's new drugs strategy in Afghanistan.
IAEA and Iran
He said though that Iran did not have 6 months to let the IAEA know about the new facility, that it should have been informed as soon as it decided to construct the facility.